Which of the following is NOT part of the recommended marking interval guidelines?

Which of the following is NOT part of the recommended marking interval guidelines?

• A. 10-100 meters depending on terrain
• B. 50 meters
• C. 200 meters
• D. 5 meters

Answer: (C)

The idea behind marking intervals is to place indicators at distances that keep the route readable and reliable as you move, adjusting for terrain, visibility, and pace. Spacing is typically kept tight enough so you can see the next marker without losing orientation, while not slowing you down unnecessarily. Distances like ten to a hundred meters, depending on terrain, reflect that you may tighten spacing in rough or obstructed areas and loosen it in open ground. A standard around fifty meters is commonly used as a practical balance, ensuring you don’t skip markers while still progressing efficiently. In very tight or critical sections, spacing around five meters helps prevent missing a turn or losing the route in dense features. Two hundred meters, however, would create a large gap where a marker could be hidden by terrain or vegetation, or you could lose track of the route between markers. That makes navigation risky and undermines the purpose of marking intervals, so this distance isn’t part of the recommended guidelines.

The idea behind marking intervals is to place indicators at distances that keep the route readable and reliable as you move, adjusting for terrain, visibility, and pace. Spacing is typically kept tight enough so you can see the next marker without losing orientation, while not slowing you down unnecessarily.

Distances like ten to a hundred meters, depending on terrain, reflect that you may tighten spacing in rough or obstructed areas and loosen it in open ground. A standard around fifty meters is commonly used as a practical balance, ensuring you don’t skip markers while still progressing efficiently. In very tight or critical sections, spacing around five meters helps prevent missing a turn or losing the route in dense features.

Two hundred meters, however, would create a large gap where a marker could be hidden by terrain or vegetation, or you could lose track of the route between markers. That makes navigation risky and undermines the purpose of marking intervals, so this distance isn’t part of the recommended guidelines.